Ford Mustang Mach‑E Dimensions

writ­ten 9/8/26, updat­ed 9/8/26


Yes, I know this isn’t a GT. It’s a Select AWD


Dimensions

Here, I have record­ed some dimen­sions for the Mach‑E for ref­er­ence. I’ve includ­ed exte­ri­or specs for all 3 mod­els, but inte­ri­or is for the GT/Rally

2020 — present (2026)

NOTE: The pic­tures have cov­ers and mats. The mea­sure­ments are for with­out them. Please be aware that mea­sure­ments are func­tion­al­ly approx­i­mate and not 100% exact


Exterior

Accord­ing to Ford’s Offi­cial Tech Specs

Mus­tang Mach‑E Select ER, AWDMus­tang Mach‑E GTMus­tang Mach‑E Ral­ly
Wheel­base117.5″117.5″117.5″
Length185.6″186.7″187.0″
Width74.1″74.1″74.1″
Height64″63.3″64.9″
Track Width, F63.5″63.5″63.5″
Track Width, R63.4″63.4″63.3″
Ground Clear­ance6.2″5.0″5.8″
Curb Weight4,748 lb4,993 lb5,016 lb

Con­ver­sion Sum­ma­ry — Aver­age and Approx­i­mate

Wheel­base: 9′ 9″

Length: 15′ 6″

Width: 6′

Height: 5′ 4″

Weight: 2.3 tons


Trunk Cargo Interior

Note: This is for the GT Ral­ly, so there’s less space inside than the Select and Pre­mi­um mod­els. I have car­go cov­ers and mats. Num­bers are cal­cu­lat­ed to be with­out the cov­ers and mats. All mea­sure­ments are approx­i­mate, not exact

Open­ing Width (Yel­low): 43″ down to 42″

Trunk Height (Orange): 25″ pil­lar; 28″ mid

Trunk Depth (Green): 30.75″ edge; 33″ mid

Open­ing Diag­o­nal (Pur­ple): 47″

Car­go Width (Pink): 42.5″ wheel bump; 46″ vents

Car­go Seats-down Length (Light Blue): 59″ to top of seats (not includ­ing head­rest)

Trunk Rim to Info­tain­ment Screen (White): 101″

Rear Seat Interior

Note: This is for the GT Ral­ly, so there’s less space inside than the Select and Pre­mi­um mod­els. The pic­tures show a dog seat cov­er. Mea­sure­ments are for with­out the cov­er, front seats at mod­er­ate posi­tion­ing, and all approx­i­mate.

Seat Length (Yel­low): 50″

Seat Height (Pur­ple): 25″ (to top of seat, exclud­ing head­rest)

Seat Depth (Orange): 19.25″

Height (Green): 36″ max (rear); 33″ min (thigh)

Car­go Length (Red): 52″ min (arm­rest); 57″ max (door)

Footwell (White): 10″ min (mod­er­ate posi­tion­ing)

Gasoline vs. Hybrid vs. Battery Electric (BEV) Fuel Statistics Comparison

writ­ten 06/10/23, updat­ed 01/31/25

What

Fuelup com­par­isons among three vehi­cles owned by me for the dura­tion of own­er­ship: 2020 Sub­aru Out­back XT Onyx Edi­tion, 2022 Ford Mav­er­ick XL Hybrid, & 2023 Ford Mus­tang Mach‑E AWD Stan­dard Range

Cal­cu­lat­ing: MPG/MPGe, Cost per Gal­lon of gaso­line (or equiv­a­lent), and then by month to even the odds

Comparison Chart

2020 Out­back (Gas)2022 Mav­er­ick (Hybrid)2023 Mach‑E (BEV)
Time Owned29 months12 months23 months
Total Miles Dri­ven18,503 mi8,051 mi15,0007 mi
Total Fuel Vol­ume 941.0 gal203.3 gal154.8 gal‑E*
(5,216.2 kWh)
Total Fuel Cost$3,243.92$774.93$1,229.31
MPG/MPGe19.7 MPG39.6 MPG97 MPGe
Cost per Gal­lon (or kWh)$3.45$3.81$0.24
Miles Dri­ven per Month638 mi670 mi653 mi
Fuel Vol­ume per Month32.4 gal16.9 gal6.7 gal‑E
(226.8 kWh)
Fuel Cost per Month$111.86$64.58$53.54
Total Main­te­nance Cost$596.62$362.54$465.39
Fun Cost (Addi­tions)$2623.03$2536.99$1032.88
*gal‑E = gal­lons gaso­line equiv­a­lent

Basic Vehicle Statistics

2020 Out­back
(Gas)
2022 Mav­er­ick
(Hybrid)
2023 Mach‑E
(BEV)
Engine2.4L F‑4cyl Tur­bo CVT AWD2.5L I‑4cyl FHEV
FWD
1‑spd DD Elec­tric
AWD
HP260 hp @ 5,600 rpm162 hp @ 5,600 rpm*266 hp
Torque277 lb-ft @ 2,000 rpm155 lb-ft @ 4,000 rpm428 lb-ft
Fuel Capac­i­ty18.5 gal13.8 gal70kWh
Fuel Econ­o­my
(city/hwy/comb)
23/30/2642/33/3799/86/93
Range (EPA)481 mi511 mi224 mi
Weight3,884 lb3,674 lb4,498 lb
Wheel­base108.1 in121.1 in117.5 in
Length191.3 in199.7 in185.6 in
Width
(with mir­ror)
82.0 in83.5 in74.1 in
Height66.4 in68.7 in64.0 in
Tow Rat­ing3,500 lb2,000 lb-
*191hp total hybrid pow­er deliv­ery; DD = Direct Dri­ve; Fun fact: 70 kWh = 2.1‑gal gaso­line

Analysis

Easy to see that the data favors elec­tri­fied vehi­cles: cheap­er, less fuel con­sumed, bet­ter MPGs

Cost per gal­lon of gas (or equiv­a­lent) goes increas­es the more elec­tri­fied the vehi­cle. Keep in mind, over­all cost is less

Main­te­nace costs decrease with increased elec­tri­fi­ca­tion. How­ev­er, both elec­tri­fied vehi­cles were owned for less time than the gaso­line car